hhf/pfatt
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 26 Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

Has anyone tried 2.5.x with the supplicant method? #22

New issue
Closed
opened 2020-08-19 10:11:06 +05:30 by bigjohns97 · 5 comments
bigjohns97 commented 2020-08-19 10:11:06 +05:30 (Migrated from github.com)
Copy link

Just wondering if anyone has tried the 2.5.x version of PfSense with the supplicant method, thinking of trying it out this weekend.

Just wondering if anyone has tried the 2.5.x version of PfSense with the supplicant method, thinking of trying it out this weekend.
MonkWho commented 2020-08-24 23:59:41 +05:30 (Migrated from github.com)
Copy link

Pfatt scripts have not been tested on pfsense 2.5.x. If you do end up testing please let us know if you encounter any issues.

Pfatt scripts have not been tested on pfsense 2.5.x. If you do end up testing please let us know if you encounter any issues.
bigjohns97 commented 2020-08-25 00:03:38 +05:30 (Migrated from github.com)
Copy link

I ended up upgrading and haven't come across any issues yet.

I ended up upgrading and haven't come across any issues yet.
MonkWho commented 2020-08-25 00:13:03 +05:30 (Migrated from github.com)
Copy link

Excellent news. Are you using a traditional bypass with your RG still hooked up or are you using a supplicant method?

Excellent news. Are you using a traditional bypass with your RG still hooked up or are you using a supplicant method?
bigjohns97 commented 2020-08-25 00:15:30 +05:30 (Migrated from github.com)
Copy link

Supplicant, kernel module was already present.

Original install was from a 2.4.5 - updated to p1 through GUI, and then to 2.5.0 through GUI as well.

PfblockerNG did require a uninstall and reinstall but everything else worked out of the box. I am running a beta version of pfb

Supplicant, kernel module was already present. Original install was from a 2.4.5 - updated to p1 through GUI, and then to 2.5.0 through GUI as well. PfblockerNG did require a uninstall and reinstall but everything else worked out of the box. *I am running a beta version of pfb*
MonkWho commented 2020-08-25 00:21:25 +05:30 (Migrated from github.com)
Copy link

Perfect. Thank you for providing additional details.

Perfect. Thank you for providing additional details.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag specified
Branches Tags
master
supplicant
supplicant_OPNsense_testing
No results found.
Labels
Clear labels   
bug

Something isn't working

  
duplicate

This issue or pull request already exists

  
enhancement

New feature or request

  
good first issue

Good for newcomers

  
help wanted

Extra attention is needed

  
invalid

This doesn't seem right

  
question

Further information is requested

  
wontfix

This will not be worked on

No labels
bug
duplicate
enhancement
good first issue
help wanted
invalid
question
wontfix
Milestone
Clear milestone
No items
No milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No items
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: hhf/pfatt#22
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?